Hello again! @Nasdaq_Nico
I thank you very much again for your response and opinions regarding my questions and queries, and of course, I am 100% convinced of the PCS team and the chefs, the fact that worries me mainly and well, because it is something that undoubtedly generates entries or participation from third parties (in this case it was more of an observation and questioning to the Mancakeswap team rather than to pancakeswap) also because of the fact that at some point, we talked about the implementation deadlines among other things, and added to that, the little information available and updates regarding what is being a great value proposition that are the affiliates, leaves me somewhat intrigued by the fact that the first proposal has taken so long -and for the rest has gone somewhat unnoticed- I must also tell you that within, so to speak, the “demands” of this project, was precisely the “technical help” from the pancakeswap team, and well, also in view of the fact that we are surrounded by good and bad and successful projects and others not so much or even the so-called “rug pulls” is even something that worries me that it can indirectly harm the ecosystem and since it is a proposal -that of affiliates- to add value and not to have consequences or subtract value as such, for whatever reason.
As I said, I appreciate your words, I took the time to read, and I also raise this fact again, that in a certain way it is not entirely clear how potential affiliates are going to be filtered, since that in itself is already a first layer of security/precaution/prevention and I look forward to this project itself, effectively taking value and bearing fruit and being successfully the first PCS affiliate project.
Greetings!