Discussion of Proposal to Redirect Side Product Fee Streams for Treasury Optimization

Discussion of Proposal to Redirect Side Product Fee Streams for Treasury Optimization

TL;DR

The Kitchen proposes redirecting the fees from PancakeSwap’s side products - defined as products other than AMM v2, v3, and Infinity - to the PancakeSwap Treasury, empowering the Kitchen to put them to work for the protocol. If passed, this enables the Kitchen to apply this reallocation to side products within the defined scope.

To be clear about the scale: side product fees currently represent less than 2% of total protocol fees.

This is not a change to our deflationary model in any material way. The core burn engine powered by AMM trading fees remains completely unchanged. This is an optimization of where minor streams are allocated: redirecting it from a burn program where it barely registers, to Treasury where it can be actively deployed for the long-term benefit of the protocol.


The Numbers: What This Actually Represents

Protocol fee breakdown (on average, weekly basis)

For the purposes of this proposal, side products refer to all PancakeSwap products outside of AMM v2, AMM v3, and Infinity.

Note: The deflationary engine is powered by spot trading fees across AMM v2, v3, and Infinity. Fees from other products together represent less than two percent of total protocol fees.


Background

For nearly three years, the Kitchen has delivered one of the most consistent deflationary records in all of DeFi. Since the deflationary era began in September 2023, CAKE’s total supply has fallen from an all-time high of ~392M to ~338M as of last month — a reduction of roughly 14% sustained across 33 consecutive months. This did not happen by accident. It is the result of repeated, deliberate commitments: retiring veCAKE, cutting daily emissions from ~40,000 to ~22,500, and the achievement of a net burn of ~8.19% of supply in 2025 alone.

PancakeSwap’s deflation is backed by real substance: week after week, we use real protocol revenue to buy CAKE back on the open market — millions of dollars of genuine, recurring demand — and send it to the burn address. Every CAKE we take out of circulation is backed by actual economic activity. A ~14% reduction achieved entirely through revenue-funded open-market buybacks is one of the most credible deflationary records in the industry.

The engine behind that record is our spot trading products. AMM v2, v3, Infinity, and generate over 98% of protocol fees — and they continue to be completely unchanged under this proposal. The burn program’s power, credibility, and deflationary trajectory are entirely preserved. In recent months, PancakeSwap’s total effective burn has run on the order of 2M CAKE per month. Our deflationary trajectory would continue effectively undisturbed — and the resilience we gain is well worth it.


Rationale

1. The burn impact is negligible and the deflationary engine is untouched. At a monthly effective burn of ~2M CAKE, the core deflationary thesis is driven by spot trading across AMM v2, v3, and Infinity, and would continue unchanged. The trajectory is well established; this reallocation does not move it in any material way. Side products as burn contributors are minor by any measure - this proposal recognizes that reality and puts those fees to better use.

2. Treasury optimization: A well optimized treasury enables capacity to fund audits, security, development, and incentives. Protocol resilience, sustained development, ecosystem leadership - the Treasury reserves fund all of these, and optimizing the protocol’s operating base ultimately serves CAKE holders.

3. Reserves fund resilience and the next generation of products for our users. Burned CAKE is gone. Treasury BNB can be put to work - seeding new pools, funding integrations, and shipping the products our users come to PancakeSwap for. This converts a small static benefit into durable capacity to keep building.


Specification

If this proposal passes, the Kitchen will:

  • :small_blue_diamond: Redirect the fees generated by side products - defined as any PancakeSwap products outside of AMM v2, AMM v3, and Infinity - to the PancakeSwap Treasury

  • :small_blue_diamond: Continue every other burn stream — spot trading fees across AMM v2, v3, and Infinity, and other burn mechanisms — entirely unchanged.

  • :small_blue_diamond: Direct these funds primarily toward research & development and initiatives that strengthen the PancakeSwap ecosystem — sustaining product innovation, integrations, and growth for our users through the cycles ahead.

Scope

This proposal affects only side product fees. It does not alter CAKE max supply, emissions, or any other tokenomics parameter.

Final Notes

This proposal is an administrative and Treasury management improvement, not a change in PancakeSwap’s long-term tokenomics direction. It strengthens the protocol’s financial resilience while preserving flexibility around treasury optimization.

Please leave your comments in the forum below.

It’s impossible to vote and decide anything on this if the treasury isn’t transparent. How much is the treasury, what is its current use, where is the money applied? How much does the pancake operation cost? We have no information about this.

Meanwhile, you will eliminate 2% of the burns from a token that, admittedly, has been deflationary for some years, but it’s also true that it’s far from having a satisfactory price performance for its holders.

I am in favor of giving more funds to research and development, especially in innovation. But I am also in favor of reducing the CAKE that is going to the LPs, which are the main selling force. But I repeat, transparency is needed regarding revenue and expenses, and the fund so that the holder can decide clearly.

Title: Strategic Counter-Proposal: Embracing Retail Investors, On-Chain Transparency, and a Dynamic 50% Revenue-Share Cap for True Ecosystem Growth

​Dear Kitchen and Fellow CAKE Holders,

​While the primary argument for this proposal—securing independent funding for R&D and securing top-tier talent in a global, inflation-adjusted market—is inherently rational, the current execution risks alienating the core asset of PancakeSwap: our retail community.

​Uniswap’s trajectory aims at institutional capital. PancakeSwap’s foundational strength, however, has always been its mass appeal (retail focus). To win this structural war, we must synergize with our users rather than isolating them through a flat, permanent fee-redirection model.

​If our newly revamped side products, such as Perps v2 and AI-driven initiatives, explode in volume as the global crypto market scales into the multi-trillion-dollar era, a flat 100% redirection to the Treasury becomes a disproportionate extraction from token holders.

​Therefore, I strongly urge the Kitchen to consider the following framework before finalizing this vote:

  1. On-Chain Financial Transparency: If the current $1.93M (approx. $37k/week) from side products is required for $300k+ global developer salaries and security audits, present this explicitly as a formal budget. True DAOs function on clear P&L reports, not opaque wallet migrations.
  2. A Tiered, Dynamic Revenue-Sharing Model: We must implement a smart-contract-enforced trigger based on scale. While a 100% Treasury allocation is acceptable during the incubation phase, once side products scale into substantial revenue streams (e.g., matching the multi-million/billion-dollar milestones), at least 50% of the net profit must automatically be shared with CAKE holders via buyback-and-burn or staking distributions.

​By ensuring that the upside of these “new toys” is shared 50/50 when they mature, we transform general users from critical skeptics into aggressive brand evangelists. Let us not mimic centralized corporations. Let us build a transparent, scalable, and retail-driven protocol built for the next 30 years.

​Thank you.

1 Like

Another question… regarding PancakeSwapX, the route that handles RWA trading. There isnt fees for the users. Are there fees charged there in filler side? Where is this going? The trading volume exceeds $700 millions and is trending upward for the coming period. Are there plans to add fees? Would this be considered a side product or not? Would it go towards a burn?

There are currently no protocol-side fees from PCSX, so it does not appear in the fee breakdown above. PCSX is built into the familiar Swap interface and under Swap products.

There is externally aggregated data on DeFiLlama and Dune, meanwhile building a fully consolidated view is being assessed, we hear this feedback and thank you for the suggestion.